Nikon can produce a maximum resolution of 6016 x 4000 pixels, whilst Canon can only achieve 5184 x 3456 pixels. I know you’ve become used to disregarding megapixel resolution numbers, but they do have significance when the difference is significant. More importantly to me, Nikon sensors not only have greater resolution, but they also perform better in almost every metric. What lens or lenses you purchase, as well as any additional equipment you may want for aerial photography, are all important considerations. For more sophisticated users, Canon offers a wider range of alternatives, including modifications of the mm lenses. For example, whereas Nikon offers just one pricey f2.8 VR model, Canon offers four!
Even a tiny advantage might be evident while carrying your gear for extended periods of time, despite the fact that the differences are insignificant in comparison. The results of the preceding review should, however, be regarded with caution. In order to determine the ratings, they were compared to similar-priced cameras that were currently available on the market at the time of the assessment.
If you are thinking about purchasing the Nikon D3200, one of the most compelling arguments in favor of doing so is the camera’s low noise, even at extremely high ISO. In addition, the Nikon D3200 offers a higher color depth when compared to the Canon T3i. The little technological differences between Canon and Nikon are insignificant and, for the most part, unimportant in the context of portrait photography. When it comes to low noise at high ISOs, Canon has a little edge, whereas Nikon has a slight advantage when it comes to dynamic range.
Many current cameras are capable of not just taking still photographs, but also recording video footage. For moving pictures, both of the cameras under consideration are equipped with sensors that have a suitable readout speed for moving images, and both provide the same movie specs (1080/30p). When compared to the Canon Rebel T3i, the Nikon D3200 is likewise a serious contender.
In addition, the Canon T3i’s lens has a greater resolution of 1040K dots, compared to the Nikon D3200’s 921K dots, which is a significant improvement.
That the Canon T3i is $50 more costly than the Nikon 3200 is a reasonable price differential, which is clearly justified by the superior quality of the image captured. On this page, you may discover a wonderful offer on the Canon T3i digital camera. The Nikon D3 is clearly more small and lightweight when compared to the Canon T3i when the two cameras are placed side by side. The size difference between the two, on the other hand, is not large, and it is unlikely to have an impact on the purchasing choice.
Your suggestions have assisted me in deciding which camera to buy. I’ll upload some high-quality aerial photographs to the forum as soon as I can. I’ve been looking at digital SLR cameras and have narrowed my choices down to either the Canon T3i or the Nikon d3200. My issue is that I can’t come up with a genuinely convincing argument to purchase either one or the other. Print After a normalization phase, which turns all photos, regardless of their original resolution, to an 8Mpix image, this page provides the print performance measurement numbers and graph produced from a RAW image.
And, in the meanwhile, I’ll be able to obtain some further information. Prior to making a purchasing decision, it is highly recommended that you have a look at this site. If you want to develop your portraiture abilities, you can’t possibly do so without include flash in the mix. This wireless flash capability is really convenient to have on hand.
It informs you of how near the pixels are to one other in terms of distance. One aspect that has not been taken into consideration till now is the cost. As it was when they were originally debuted, the Nikon D3200 continues to be much less expensive than the Canon T3i. As with the ‘dimensions’ category, there isn’t much to distinguish between the contenders, but a somewhat lighter Nikon takes home the win here as well.

The amount of light that can be collected by a pixel or photosite depends on the size of the pixel or photosite. When the size of the pixel is increased, the amount of light that can be gathered by that pixel increases. The differences between the two cameras are typically minor, and depending on the style of photography you are interested in, either one should be adequate and surely will not disappoint. Both cameras have a three-inch LCD screen, but the Canon T3i comes out on top in this particular comparison. The Canon features a better resolution screen that is also completely articulated, but the Nikon has a fixed screen that is less versatile.

There is no difference between the viewfinders of the two cameras in terms of field of vision (95 percent), magnification, or resolution (0.53x). The following table summarizes some of the additional distinguishing characteristics of the Canon T3i, the Nikon D3200, and other related cameras. The Canon T3i, the Nikon D3200, and other comparable cameras are shown in the following table. If, on the other hand, you are contemplating purchasing a Canon T3i, one of the most appealing characteristics that may persuade you to make the purchase is the high resolution screen with 1040K dots, which has the potential to convince you to make the purchase. For those who are interested in videography, the articulating screen is undoubtedly a significant benefit.

Sorry, there was no activity found. Please try a different filter.