Gukesh and Nepomniachtchi continue to lead after draws in Round 6


FIDE Candidates 2024 (6)

Gukesh and Nepomniachtchi continue to lead after draws in Round 6

The FIDE Candidates in Toronto, Canada are almost at the half
way stage. Not much has been settled and 6 of the 8 players
can still regard themselves as still being in the hunt
for tournament victory.


Today Ian Nepomniachtchi chose a drawish variation against
Fabiano Caruana and whilst the American had to be accurate
a draw was what we got. Nepomniachtchi said most of his preparation
was focussed on the Sicilian but also such easy days are a key
part of tournament strategy. How this draw will be seen will
very much depend on the final result, wasted white against a major rival?
Good pragmatic decision on the way to the title? We’ll see.



Gukesh did try against Hikaru Nakamura, his problem was that
a smart piece of preparation equalised the game for Nakamura almost straight
away and he followed up with accuracy to produce a totally drawn position.
Praggnanandhaa moved to +1 with a win against Nijat Abasov. This
was a fighting game decided on the run up to first time control,
38…Rxf6? looks like the decisive error in an objectively level position.
Alireza Firouzja is struggling here, today he made two very serious errors 11…Bb7
and 13…Qxf2 early on and was crushed, he did limp on to move 40
before resigning but the game was long gone.



Round 6 Standings:
1st= Gukesh, Nepomniachtchi 4pts,
3rd= Caruana, Praggnanandhaa 3.5pts,
5th= Vidit, Nakamura 3pts,
7th= Firouzja, Abasov 1.5pts.



Round 7 11th April at 19:30BST:
Nakamura-Nepomniachtchi,
Caruana-Praggnanandhaa,
Abasov-Vidit,
Firouzja-Gukesh.


Round 6 Summary


Hikaru Nakamura came with a new idea in an already quite rare variation of the Accelerated Dragon Sicilian.
7…c4 was new and already 8.d3?! wasn’t the best try (probably 8.Re1 or 8.b3).
Nakamura spent time on 16…a5 and accurately forced a very drawish position.



Santosh Vidit was winning straight out of the opening against Alireza Firouzja. 11…Bb7
and 13…Qxf2 were both bad moves. The reason I’m so appalled by attempts to change
the World Championship cycle is that the Candidates and World Championship matches
test something extra that’s not tested by other formats, how do players behave when you apply real heat? You wouldn’t
get that with a lot of rapid and blitz games where the individual results aren’t
so critical. This event has been a real treat so far.
Firouzja is learning some very harsh lessons here. He will need to rethink his strategy to
prevent a complete disaster.


The final game to finish was Praggnanandhaa against Nijat Abasov
was a scrappy game according to the engines. Both players were
on their own early in a Semi-Tarrasch and the evaluation fluctuated
between meaningful advantage to white and equal. Abasov lost it
in the final moves before time control, 38…Rxf6? was
the losing move, it opens up the 3rd rank and made it hard to keep rooks on.
38…Rd6 or 38…Kg6 or even 38…a5 were all equal. 40…Kg7? ended all doubt as to
the result as rooks quickly came off and the queenside pawns were then
unstoppable.



Ian Nepomniachtchi played the Four Knights against Fabiano Caruana and
the game was drawn on move 41 without the slightest doubt that this
would be the case. It is a valid strategy to avoid a battle against
people who are likely your main rivals if you think you can score
heavily against the rest of the field, I believe that’s precisely what
Magnus Carlsen did in the London Candidates. Nepomniachtchi explained
that most of his prep was aimed at Caruana’s Sicilian. Anand said in commentary that
such strategic draws and extra rest days were a key part of strategy
and that Nepomniachtchi had learned this and executed it perfectly
in the last Candidates tournament which he of course won.













FIDE Candidates 2024 Toronto CAN (CAN), 3-26 iv 2024 cat. XX (2745)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Gukesh, D g IND 2743 * * ½ . ½ . 1 . ½ . ½ . . . 1 . 4 2867
2. Nepomniachtchi, Ian g RUS 2758 ½ . * * ½ . ½ . 1 . . . 1 . ½ . 4 2860
3. Caruana, Fabiano g USA 2803 ½ . ½ . * * . . ½ . ½ . ½ . 1 . 2791
4. Praggnanandhaa, R g IND 2747 0 . ½ . . . * * 1 . ½ . ½ . 1 . 2791
5. Vidit, Santosh Gujrathi g IND 2727 ½ . 0 . ½ . 0 . * * 1 . 1 . . . 3 2766
6. Nakamura, Hikaru g USA 2789 ½ . . . ½ . ½ . 0 . * * 1 . ½ . 3 2735
7. Firouzja, Alireza g FRA 2760 . . 0 . ½ . ½ . 0 . 0 . * * ½ . 2549
8. Abasov, Nijat g AZE 2632 0 . ½ . 0 . 0 . . . ½ . ½ . * * 2573











Round 6 (April 10, 2024)
Gukesh, D – Nakamura, Hikaru ½-½ 40 B27 Sicilian Early Fianchetto
Nepomniachtchi, Ian – Caruana, Fabiano ½-½ 41 C47 Four Knights
Praggnanandhaa, R – Abasov, Nijat 1-0 45 D40 Semi-Tarrasch Defence
Vidit, Santosh Gujrathi – Firouzja, Alireza 1-0 40 B57 Sicilian Sozin Attack

FIDE World Championship Candidates Round 6 Commentary


Discover more from reviewer4you.com

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

0
Your Cart is empty!

It looks like you haven't added any items to your cart yet.

Browse Products
Powered by Caddy

Discover more from reviewer4you.com

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading