Democracy Unraveled: Inside Romania’s Electoral Coup Against Calin Georgescu
(Analysis) In an extraordinary series of events, Romanian electoral authorities have barred presidential frontrunner Calin Georgescu from participating in the upcoming elections.
The Central Electoral Committee announced this decision on March 7, 2025, but only published it Sunday evening via social media, not on their official website.
The timeline reveals troubling procedural patterns. Georgescu received just two days to appeal this ruling before the March 12 deadline.
The Committee cited his alleged failure to “respect electoral procedures” and “defend democracy” without specifying which procedures he violated.
They also claimed he improperly disclosed campaign finances—six months after initially approving his candidacy.
This decision builds upon a December 6, 2024 Constitutional Court ruling that annulled the entire first round of presidential elections.
That four-page document ordered a complete restart of the electoral process but contained no plaintiff, no defendant, and minimal legal reasoning.
Most significantly, this December 6 ruling directly contradicted the same court’s December 2 decision. The earlier ruling had validated election results showing Georgescu in first place and Elena Lascuni in second. The Court explicitly declared this December 2 decision “final and obligatory.”
Romanian secret services declassified—but did not publish—documents on December 4 that allegedly justified this reversal.
Democracy Unraveled: Inside Romania’s Electoral Coup Against Calin Georgescu
The 28-page intelligence report contained extensive redactions and made general claims about Russian activities. It identified 130 TikTok accounts supporting Georgescu with views under 500,000 each.
Close examination reveals evidence tampering. One document visibly shows its date altered from November 28 to December 4, according to research fellow Richard Schenk —creating the appearance of new evidence emerging after the December 2 validation of results.
The intelligence report claimed suspicious activity occurred “two weeks before the election,” yet the Constitutional Court claimed interference “from the very beginning.”
Both Georgescu and second-place Lascuni represent political forces outside Romania’s traditional ruling coalition. The governing parties’ candidate reportedly polls at approximately 15%, significantly behind both frontrunners.
The procedural irregularities stand out starkly: decisions published with minimal appeal time, contradictory court rulings within four days, altered document dates, and vague accusations without specific legal citations.
The Electoral Committee took the extraordinary step of judging a candidate’s “democratic values” rather than simply applying electoral law.
Romania, an EU member state of nearly 20 million people, now faces a fundamental test of its democratic institutions. The blocking of the leading presidential candidate through questionable legal mechanisms raises profound questions about election integrity.
Citizens across the political spectrum now watch as Georgescu attempts to navigate an increasingly constrained legal process before time runs out.
Download the documents from the intelligence report:
Democracy Unraveled: Inside Romania’s Electoral Coup Against Calin Georgescu
