Former President Donald Trump announced his intention to open a detention center for illegal immigrants at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Trump made this statement during the signing ceremony of the Laken Riley Act on Wednesday, January 29, 2025.
The proposed facility would house up to 30,000 migrants living illegally in the United States. Trump claims the center will detain “the worst criminal illegal aliens who threaten the American people.”
He argues some detainees pose such a risk that their home countries cannot be trusted to keep them. The Laken Riley Act is named after a nursing student killed in February 2024.
However, it requires the Department of Homeland Security to detain non-U.S. nationals charged with specific offenses. These offenses include theft-related crimes and assaults on law enforcement officers.
The act also empowers state attorneys general to sue the federal government over perceived failures in immigration enforcement. This move marks a significant shift in the purpose of Guantánamo Bay.
The U.S. has used the facility to house detainees from the war on terrorism since 2002. The Biden administration had reduced the number of detainees to just 15 by transferring 11 to Oman.
Controversy Surrounds Trump’s Immigration Plan
Trump’s plan has sparked controversy among immigrant rights activists and some Democrats. Critics argue the law exploits a tragedy to create chaos and cruelty. They claim it does little to address crime or reform the outdated federal immigration system.
The ACLU argues that the law could detain individuals for years over past nonviolent offenses. Experts anticipate legal challenges over the provisions for mandatory detentions and state attorneys general’s authority in immigration matters.
In addition, the financial burden of establishing more detention centers may face opposition. Advocates will likely contest how the government allocates federal funds to support these expenses.
This shift in U.S. immigration policy will likely have far-reaching implications for domestic politics and international relations. The situation continues to evolve, promising ongoing debate and scrutiny in the coming months.
