As a child, we probably did not have to think much about motivating ourselves. If we were in school and had art activity time, we just went ahead and painted something.
As adults, we are more concerned with goals and affirmations and other strategies to motivate us to feel energized to do what we want to accomplish.
But a recent research study indicates affirmations in the form of telling ourselves what to do may not work as well as asking ourselves about a task. Here is the news story about that research.
Will we succeed? The science of self-motivation
University of Illinois News
Can you help you? Recent research by University of Illinois Professor Dolores Albarracin and Visiting Assistant Professor Ibrahim Senay, along with Kenji Noguchi, Assistant Professor at Southern Mississippi University, has shown that those who ask themselves whether they will perform a task generally do better than those who tell themselves that they will.
Little research exists in the area of self-talk, although we are aware of an inner voice in ourselves and in literature. From children’s books like “The Little Engine That Could,” in which the title character says, “I think I can,” to Holden Caulfield’s misanthropic musings in “A Catcher in the Rye,” internal dialogue often influences the way people motivate and shape their own behavior.
But was “The Little Engine” using the best motivational tool, or does “Bob the Builder” have the right idea when he asks, “Can we fix it?”
Albarracin’s team tested this kind of motivation in 50 study participants, encouraging them explicitly to either spend a minute wondering whether they would complete a task or telling themselves they would.
The participants showed more success on an anagram task, rearranging set words to create different words, when they asked themselves whether they would complete it than when they told themselves they would.
Further experimentation had students in a seemingly unrelated task simply write two ostensibly unrelated sentences, either “I Will” or “Will I,” and then work on the same task. Participants did better when they wrote, “Will” followed by “I” even though they had no idea that the word writing related to the anagram task.
Why does this happen? Professor Albarracin’s team suspected that it was related to an unconscious formation of the question “Will I” and its effects on motivation. By asking themselves a question, people were more likely to build their own motivation.
In a follow-up experiment, participants were once again parsed into the “I will” and “Will I” categories, but this time were then asked how much they intended to exercise in the following week. They were also made to fill out a psychological scale meant to measure intrinsic motivation.
The results of this experiment showed that participants not only did better as a result of the question, but that asking themselves a question did indeed increase their intrinsic motivation.
These findings are likely to have implications in cognitive, social, clinical, health and developmental psychology, as well as in clinical, educational and work settings.
“We are turning our attention to the scientific study of how language affects self-regulation,” Professor Albarracin said. “Experimental methods are allowing us to investigate people’s inner speech, of both the explicit and implicit variety, and how what they say to themselves shapes the course of their behaviors.”
Research like this challenges traditional paradigms regarding public service messages and self-help literature designed to motivate people toward healthier or more productive behavior.
“The popular idea is that self-affirmations enhance people’s ability to meet their goals,” Professor Albarracin said. “It seems, however, that when it comes to performing a specific behavior, asking questions is a more promising way of achieving your objectives.”
The trio published its research, supported by the National Institutes of Health, in the April 2010 edition of the journal Psychological Science.
“This work represents a basic cognitive approach to how language provides a window between thoughts and action,” said Dr. James W. Pennebaker, Professor and Chair of the Department of Psychology at the University of Texas.
“The reason it is so interesting is that it shows that by using language analysis, we can see that social cognitive ideas are relevant to objective real world behaviors and that the ways people talk about their behavior can predict future action.”
Provided by University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Source: PhysOrg.com
Dolores Albarracin is a co-editor of The Handbook of Attitudes.
~~~
Photo of child painter from book Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications.
Image of ‘The Little Engine That Could’ from post When positive thinking is not so helpful.
self-motivation, personal motivation, personal growth development, self growth, personal growth resources
Visited 278 times, 1 visit(s) today
Douglas Eby (M.A./Psychology) is author of the Creative Mind series of sites which provide “Information and inspiration to enhance creativity and personal development.”
* Note – Links to programs and products may be affiliate links, which means a company or publisher provides a small commission to me (paid by them, at no cost to you) if you decide to purchase. This helps support my efforts in creating the free content you read here and on my other sites, plus helps pay for costs such as website hosting. As an Amazon Associate, and an affiliate representing some other companies such as Sounds True, as well as a few coaches and psychologists, I provide links to products and programs that may be helpful to creative people. Thanks for visiting.
Discover more from reviewer4you.com
Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.
